|
|||||||||||||||||
|
What's new
Drinking and driving: Immediate removal of a driver's license saves
hundreds of lives per year |
|
|
||||||||||||||
Recently a lot of discussion took place publicly, in the press and in the legislative bodies about the measures that should be adopted to prevent alcohol related road fatalities. There was a lot of controversy concerning measures of immediate action against drivers who are found to have more than the legal acceptable limit of alcohol in their blood. New research from the University of Florida provides us with important information about the value of drastic immediate measures against drivers who break the law and put others in serious danger. We believe it is important that we should carefully examine the work of the researchers from the University of Florida. This could give us guidance for the appropriate measures and legislation to be implied in our country and others. Alcohol-impaired driving continues to cause thousands of deaths per year. The new findings indicate that immediate suspension of a driver's license is a highly effective deterrence. Timing appears to be even more important than the severity of the sanction: the quicker the better. Alcohol-impaired driving causes roughly 17,000 deaths per year, according to a 2006 study. While 46 states will suspend the driver's licenses of those caught driving while impaired, nine states do not have immediate license-revocation laws.
"The threat of immediate suspension of the driver's license is a larger
deterrent than the threat of more severe penalties that may occur at a later
date," according to Alexander C. Wagenaar, Ph.D., a professor of
epidemiology at the College of Medicine at the University of Florida and the
study's lead author. "Our results show these laws can reduce fatalities from
car crashes involving light, moderate and heavy drinkers." "The Wagenaar study is the most thorough and comprehensive one to date on
license-suspension issues. Individual studies have shown that administrative
license suspension laws have been
effective, but we were never sure about the criminal license-suspension
laws. This study puts that issue to rest. The swift, sure nature of
administrative laws can reduce drinking-driver fatal crashes and
criminal-suspension laws have virtually no effect."
Researchers looked at monthly, fatal alcohol-related car crashes from January 1976 through to December 2002 across all 46 states with administrative license suspension laws. They compared the effects of immediate license suspension with post-conviction license suspension. For measures, they used single-vehicle nighttime occurrence, as well as
blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.01 - 0.07, 0.08 - 0.14, and BAC
higher than 0.15 g/dl. The study also accounted for differences
across time and among states, including number of drivers, traffic levels,
changing vehicle mix, auto safety standards, safety belt laws, and speed
limit changes. Even many convicted driving while impaired offenders continue to drive because they believe there is little chance that they will be apprehended driving while suspended. The development, acceptance and implementation of future technologies that will make it impossible for a driver at or above a certain blood alcohol content limit to start his car (passive alcohol ignition interlock devices) is the ultimate answer to substantially reducing alcohol-impaired driving in the United States.
Results are published in the August 2007 issue of Alcoholism: Clinical &
Experimental Research. Bibliography:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Disclaimer: The information and recommendations contained and presented in this website have been compiled from sources believed to be reliable and scientifically correct. However Progressive Insurance Company Ltd, makes no guarantee as to, and assumes no responsibility for, the correctness, sufficiency, or completeness of such information or recommendations. Other or additional information or safety measures may be required under particular circumstances.